Re: W3C Solid Community Call

I see confusion about inrupt vs. Solid in the marketplace, and how the
community is currently managed.

A CG (which this is) is designed for incubating work, that may in turn
develop further - noting, describing w3c cg here, to this audience (and
it's stakeholders),

Seems silly.

Timothy.

On Thu., 28 Mar. 2019, 9:34 pm Ruben Verborgh (UGent-imec) <
Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be wrote:

> > I totally agree about the start-up cost of W3C groups, and I would
> > strongly caution against starting one.
>
> +1, not the right timing yet
>
> > Given the number of repos in github.com/solid, I do think it could be
> > helpful to separate the specs from the implementations. Right now,
> > they're sort of awash in a sea of repositories (75) and we want to
> > make it as easy as possible for folks to find the repos to submit
> > issues and PRs.
>
> We can achieve that by having one spec repo
> (which I think is the case: https://github.com/solid/solid-spec/).
>
> We probably want to reformulate the spec to use more precise language
> (cfr. discussion in
> https://github.com/solid/solid-spec/pull/148#issuecomment-477514668)
>
> Ruben
>