- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:43:05 +0100
- To: Mitzi László <mitzil@inrupt.com>
- Cc: public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2019 17:43:39 UTC
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 18:23, Mitzi László <mitzil@inrupt.com> wrote: > Hi W3C Solid Community Group, > > You can find the final agenda [1] and dial in details [2] for the call > tomorrow at 1400 CET. > "proposal to move specs to github/w3c-solid" This proposal is problematic, in a general sense. When I spoke to Tim about starting this group, we did it because we didnt have a place (ie mailing list) for threaded conversations, of a technical nature. There is an expanse of the remit here, which im not opposed to, ie to help incubate all the solid specs. I think it's actually a good idea, it is however, a different idea from what I put down when I started the group. But in practice, a mandate needs to come explicitly from Tim, even better if he were to join the group (so that he can read mailing list discussion), and cannot be via proxy. Tim needs to say what he wants to be put under the aegis of the CG, at least initially. Overall what we require from the specs is a period of stability. If this group can help to ensure that, I think that's going to be a plus for solid. > > Mitzi > > [1] https://www.w3.org/community/solid/wiki/Meetings > > [2] https://zoom.us/j/121552099 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2019 17:43:39 UTC