- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 03:07:24 +1000
- To: RJ Herrick <RJ@beyondlogical.net>, Adam Lake <adam@mosaic.social>
- Cc: "public-solid@w3.org" <public-solid@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok1deXv_+qDcq-Uyfzs7kq2V8uQV4+tQTM7PBCDc=GyCnA@mail.gmail.com>
https://www.imsglobal.org/sites/default/files/Badges/OBv2p0Final/index.html https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/1302459 (adam lake also works for digital bazaar - he will know more about current status) background: The credentials CG was spun out of web-payments CG back in 2014 https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/2014/08/06/call-for-participation-in-credentials-community-group/ As the group proceeded, the decision was made to enable a 'verifiable claims task-force' and since then, the work on 'verifiable claims' has continued on... the nature of the group work has changed substantially in recent times. noting: https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/ to sign-up and find out https://identity.foundation/ seemingly amongst the more recent derivatives - whilst noting, solid based topologies, offer very different options to what may otherwise be more narrowly defined, as to attend to specific use-cases in a 'fit for purpose manner' that may not be holistically considerate of what solid integration might help do... the main repo for digital bazaar is https://github.com/digitalbazaar and whilst i've made the continued suggestion that it would be great if they integrated LDP amongst other things, afaik, that's yet to occur... Manu can provide a more coherent situational analysis and is cc'd... Timo. On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 02:53, RJ Herrick <RJ@beyondlogical.net> wrote: > Provable claims (or a similar term) were mentioned during the first > call. Could someone point me to a good discussion of the current state > of the topic/problem? > > If I understand correctly, it sounds like the goal is trusting the > provenance of an assertion, eg gossip. An example would be that A said > that: B said that: C said X, and I can prove from A's statement that B > really did say that, and that C did say X. Would that be correct? Thank > you. > > Best, > RJ Herrick > "There can be no planetary equity until all the sovereign nations are > abolished and we have but one accounting system--that of the one family > of humans aboard Spaceship Earth." - Buckminster Fuller > > >
Received on Sunday, 10 February 2019 17:08:22 UTC