- From: Dalton Scott <dalton@jigsaw.xyz>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 20:47:31 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ruben Verborgh <Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be>, public-solid@w3.org, mitzil@inrupt.com
- Message-ID: <CALd=h+Te1hADk8xPX8W1TpHxSA3prvBxwuH1CumUG_216roK=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Melvin, Sounds like a great plan to me! @Ruben and @Phil, does this solution work for you? Best, Dalton On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 8:34 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 18:59, Ruben Verborgh (UGent-imec) < > Ruben.Verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > >> Unsure what the status of this thread is, but I can formally take a role >> of chair to make things easier. >> My hope and assumption is that the community will steer itself mostly, >> and that chairing is more a ceremonial role that only kicks in when >> serious issues arrive. >> >> Alternatively/additionally, Mitzi from Inrupt (in CC) should be >> considered. >> > > Hey Ruben > > Unsure of the status, but having worked with you on the solid team, I'd +1 > you to be an excellent choice. > > If I'm correct there's 3 volunteers so far, Dalton, Phil and Ruben. > (Dmitri withdrew himself) > > Regarding the work load, there is nothing official in a community group, > and entirely up to the individual. Chairs can also stand down if they feel > the commitment is not a good fit. > > I've been in groups with 3 chairs before, for example, the social web xg, > and it worked pretty well. We dont normally volunteer on behalf of others. > > So, what I suggest is the following : > > To fill our immediate need with the w3c, the 3 volunteers promote > themselves to chair status. > > Then, should, there be further discussion on this topic, we could come up > with a more formal system, at a later date. > > >> >> Ruben >> > -- Dalton Scott
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2018 21:33:59 UTC