Requesting i18n review for ActivityPub

Hello,

ActivityPub is aiming to enter Candidate Recommendation by the 11th, and
we'd like to request a review for any potential i18n issues.
ActivityPub is a client to server (eg mobile applications, desktop
applications, etc) and server to server (federation) standard for
propagating social network activity through the web.

I've gone through the checklist... I don't personally anticipate much to
be flagged that hasn't already been so for ActivityStreams, on which
ActivityPub heavily relies.  ActivityPub uses ActivityStreams for its
vocabulary and serialization mechanism (via json-ld), which has already
gone through i18n review.  Aside from that, most of what ActivityPub
specifies is endpoints to which ActivityStreams objects may be
submitted.

Any and all feedback is welcome.  Thank you!

 - Christopher Allan Webber,
   on behalf of ActivityPub and the Social WG

Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 12:14:54 UTC