Can attend either, with a slight preference for Boston. Amy On Sep 26, 2016 10:19 AM, "Ann Bassetti" <ann.bassetti@yahoo.com> wrote: > Boston is fine with me, altho Bay Area is OK too. Not sure if I can > justify coming though, as I am not working on a specific Rec. Will decide > closer to that time. > > -- Ann > > > On Sep 26, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Christopher Allan Webber < > cwebber@dustycloud.org> wrote: > > > > As I've expressed elsewhere, I greatly prefer Boston. > > > > Looking forward to it! > > > > Julien Genestoux writes: > > > >> Interested in attending in person! Either Boston or SF work even though > I > >> have a slight preference for Boston! > >> Julien > >> > >> On 22 September 2016 at 06:44:36, Ben (ben@thatmustbe.me) wrote: > >> > >> Certainly Boston works better for me > >> > >>> On Sep 22, 2016 5:34 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> As previously discussed, we're looking at having another face-to-face > >>> meeting. Of people at the current F2F, the week of Nov 14, and > especially > >>> Nov 17-18 looks like the best option. We can do it at MIT (near > Boston) or > >>> Mozilla in San Francisco. > >>> > >>> We'll definitely support remote participation with video. > >>> > >>> If you're interested in attending in person, or remotely, please > respond > >>> and say whether the dates/locations would affect your decision to > attend, > >>> and also feel free to state preferences. > >>> > >>> Alternatively, if you feel we shouldn't meet again, please speak up. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> -- Sandro > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:32:03 UTC