- From: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:43:32 +0200
- To: Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
hello. thanks for getting pack to me. On 2016-06-25 06:36, Amy G wrote: > AS2 is approaching CR, and we want to make sure all of the closed issues > were handled to the satisfaction of the commenter. You > opened https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/69 and https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/53. > Are you okay with the consideration these were given, or would you like > either to be reopened for further discussion? i have added my comments to the github issues. - for #69 i am fine with closing it, as it is a feature request. - for #53 i have not read an argument why it wouldn't make the spec clearer if it said explicitly that the media type defines two kinds of documents. but i am fine with keeping it closed if the general consensus is that it is fine the way it is. thanks and cheers, dret. -- erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@dret.net | | http://dret.net/netdret | | http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 15:44:08 UTC