- From: Ben Werdmüller <ben@withknown.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:47:11 -0800
- To: hhalpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 22:47:42 UTC
Question I don't know the answer to: is it ever acceptable to attach to a centralized system (eg Akismet) to provide services like spam prevention? Or should our goal always be complete decentralization? If the latter is the case, can complete decentralization ever capture network-wide discovery? ben On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:41 PM, hhalpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > On 2016-02-18 14:03, Ben Werdmüller wrote: > >> >> > I'm super-happy to see WebMention get some good press. However, there is a > point that the article makes rather correctly re spam, and it applies not > only to WebMention but any federated system. > > While unforunately W3C/ERCIM didn't renew my D-CENT contract, we're > booting up a new research project at INRIA and University College London to > look at this problem called NEXTLEAP. The same researchers behind it are > the folks who discovered the TLS attacks and statistical disclosure attacks > on Tor, so expect some good work in this space to be fed to the W3C > shortly. I'm sure its a solvable problem. > > -- > > Harry Halpin (W3C/MIT) harry@w3.org > -- *Ben Werdmuller* CEO & co-founder, Known withknown.com | werd.io <http://goog_1933028737> +1 (312) 488-9373 Known, Inc | 421 Bryant St | San Francisco, CA 94107
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 22:47:42 UTC