- From: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:30:36 -0500
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Benjamin Goering <bengoering@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
James, would you mind doing a PR? Also, you saw that the test suite uses the same W3C license that the AS2 docs have? And that's OK? -Evan On 2016-02-02 10:34 PM, James M Snell wrote: > Yes, they are different. Feel free to merge them in with Evan's set. > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Benjamin Goering <bengoering@gmail.com> wrote: >> James, the examples in jasnell/as2corpus seem to be different than Evan's >> that are pulled from the specs. Is that right? >> >> If so, let's just add everything from jasnell/as2corpus into >> w3c-social/activitystreams-test-documents ? >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:33 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> btw... https://github.com/jasnell/as2corpus >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com> wrote: >>>> As mentioned in the call today, there's now a repo on Github with >>>> documents >>>> to use for testing parsers. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/w3c-social/activitystreams-test-documents >>>> >>>> I've initialized the documents with the examples from the -core and >>>> -vocabulary specs. It'd be great to get other examples from people as >>>> you >>>> test out parsers. >>>> >>>> I'm going to try to run a smoke test of the JavaScript library on these >>>> documents to see how well they work together. >>>> >>>> -Evan >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Benjamin Goering, Technologist >> bengo.is >> @bengo - github.com/gobengo - linkedin.com/in/benjamingoering
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2016 13:31:01 UTC