- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:34:00 -0800
- To: Benjamin Goering <bengoering@gmail.com>
- Cc: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Yes, they are different. Feel free to merge them in with Evan's set. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Benjamin Goering <bengoering@gmail.com> wrote: > James, the examples in jasnell/as2corpus seem to be different than Evan's > that are pulled from the specs. Is that right? > > If so, let's just add everything from jasnell/as2corpus into > w3c-social/activitystreams-test-documents ? > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:33 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> btw... https://github.com/jasnell/as2corpus >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com> wrote: >> > As mentioned in the call today, there's now a repo on Github with >> > documents >> > to use for testing parsers. >> > >> > https://github.com/w3c-social/activitystreams-test-documents >> > >> > I've initialized the documents with the examples from the -core and >> > -vocabulary specs. It'd be great to get other examples from people as >> > you >> > test out parsers. >> > >> > I'm going to try to run a smoke test of the JavaScript library on these >> > documents to see how well they work together. >> > >> > -Evan >> > >> > > > > -- > Benjamin Goering, Technologist > bengo.is > @bengo - github.com/gobengo - linkedin.com/in/benjamingoering
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2016 03:34:48 UTC