- From: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:19:30 +0100
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
Harry Halpin wrote: > I think the process suggestion re "Priority of Constituencies" is rather > common-sense - and still useful, as now in addition to specific feeback, > we have an *alternative* syntax to AS2.0 being developed in the WG: The "Priority of Constituencies" document is interesting, but I doubt that it would be helpful for this WG. In my view HTML5 has unnecessarily become a rather monstrous specification. Certainly that is not only a result of this process document, but both correspond to some extent. What if users are served best by theoretical purity in the long term ? Cheers, Andreas
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 17:20:04 UTC