Re: Priority of Constituencies proposal

• From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:49:14 -0700
• To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
• Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CABP7Rbfoy8VX9VVr_jkgNTAZaHUwYdGje1OAt_mNhgeRCZvxLg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:28 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, in the meantime, Pull Requests with specific improvements on the
> current working drafts that are already accepted and published work
> items of this WG are always welcome. Perhaps that would be a far more
> productive place to start?
>

For instance: https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/220

- James

> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I'd prefer to have one spec. The "Priority of Constituencies" is one way to deal with situation where there is conflict between specs or designs. In addition, a co-editor for AS2.0 would be make sense, perhaps Aaron given the work on Minimal Activity Streams?
>>
> [snip]

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 06:50:05 UTC