- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:37:59 -0700
- To: public-socialweb@w3c.org
We have had a number of open github issues. I recommend closing the following: #52 - "New media type or application/ld+json plus profile" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/52 This one has been around for a while. There was a concern brought up about the creation of the application/activity+json media type and whether or not AS2 should use the application/ld+json media type with a profile parameter. The concern is that use of the application/activity+json media type could harm interoperability. In my opinion, the concern is largely theoretical and is not backed by real implementation experience. There is nothing to be gained by switching to using the application/ld+json media type. Nor is there anything "broken" about using the "application/activity+json". #157 - "Vocabulary item for "Blog" type" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/157 In my opinion, this is unnecessary. #175 - "Should we have a type for the object of an "Offer" activity? " - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/175 In my opinion, this is unnecessary. #205 - "Object partOf Collection" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/205 Question raised over whether we need a reverse property on objects to indicate which collection(s) they are members of. In my opinion this is unnecessary. #208 - "owl:Class vs. rdf:Property (for verbs and roles)" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/208 Raises a concern over the fundamental design of verbs in AS2. This requests revisiting a design decision that was made early within the design of AS2 without presenting any new information. I see little value in rehashing the prior conversation and selected design. - James
Received on Monday, 19 October 2015 19:38:51 UTC