Re: Getting the group back on track

My JS activitystrea.ms implements experimental support for signatures
if you'd like to play around a bit
(http://github.com/jasnell/activitystrea.ms)

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:58 AM, elf Pavlik
<perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 09:13 PM, Jason Robinson wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> A big +1 the the email of Christopher.
>>
>>    > Right now, off top of my head implementers would be:
>>    >
>>    > 1) IBM Connections
>>    > 2) Pump.io
>>    > 3) MediaGoblin
>>    > 4) Objective8 (Thoughtworks)
>>    >
>>    > Anyone else?
>>
>> I'm pretty sure if a clear and well thought JSON based language comes
>> out, diaspora* is interested. However, AS2 is only the language part,
>> personally waiting to see how the protocol parts start to take shape.
>> Hoping to have more time to contribute to those stages which imho are
>> more important for our use case at least. TBH, the way that objects and
>> actions are presented for transfer is only a minor part in the whole big
>> engine of two servers exchanging messages. For diaspora*, and the
>> Friendica + Hubzilla that are connected with it using the same protocol,
>> the server to server is key.
>>
>> Personally I hope the language semantics part could be quickly locked
>> down and the work moved on to figure out the protocol stuff. There is
>> not going to be a "works for all final" version delivered by any group
>> ever - everything is always iterated on, and it is better to deliver
>> something concise and small first, instead of trying to tackle everything.
>>
>> Just a few comments regarding how diaspora* federates. Basically we have;
>>
>> * webfinger and .well-known/meta-info for discovery
>> * XML language for actions and content
>> * Salmon Magic Envelope for signing the XML content
>>
>> The project is in the works of pushing out the federation code to a
>> separate repository, which means it would be easier to start using
>> another protocol in some future. The key things that we need however are
>> pretty much the three items above;
>>
>> * discovering
>> * describing content
>> * authoring
>>
>> Especially the last one is something that I'd be interested in hearing
>> some thoughts about, what kind of idea has this group got on how to sign
>> AS2 JSON content payloads? Outside diaspora*, I've got some personal
>> plans on creating a Python library to abstract several protocols, as an
>> experiment if nothing else. Currently it supports diaspora* for some
>> limited stuff, receiving and sending posts, and I would like to add some
>> AS2 based routes there too. Content signing is *the* most important
>> thing to get right.
>
> We had months ago bit intense conversation around JSON-LD Signatures
> * http://manu.sporny.org/2013/sm-vs-jose/
> * https://youtu.be/QdUZaYeQblY
> * https://github.com/digitalbazaar/jsonld-signatures
>
> I hope to give them a try in near future. Also combined with content
> addressable versioning of documents...
>
>>
>> Regarding talk about low participation. Personally I'd feel easier to
>> participate in email discussions more. The conference call is at a
>> difficult time and I doubt any time would suit everyone. Also, I believe
>> WebEx was chosen which doesn't even work properly on Linux I guess?
>> Email is imho much more powerful as discussion can happen at any time.
>> Hoping to increase personal participation once things move away from the
>> message semantics where something JSON based is the only choice that at
>> least diaspora* would support. The AS2 draft looks very sufficient -
>> something like diaspora* couldn't implement even half of it, with our
>> current different social actions.
>>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 15 October 2015 17:17:05 UTC