Re: Social Web WG agenda for 3 November 2015

Arnaud, all,

I think that #233 is contentious, especially considering the Annotation
group's reversal of the decision to omit context from the examples.
Ref:  Remove @context from all examples -
https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/233

Thanks!

Rob


On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I finalized the agenda for tomorrow.
>
> We have many different proposals related to AS 2.0. To try and streamline
> their disposition I regrouped a bunch that James supports. I propose to
> approve them in bulk.
>
> If anyone has any concerns over any of the proposals in the bunch we will
> take those out of the bunch and proceed with the remainder. When we are
> done with that, we can discuss the rest one by one.
>
> I've used this approach before in other WGs and found that it helps
> expedite the process of identifying and closing the non-controversial
> issues.
>
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-11-03
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies -
> IBM Software Group
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305