W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > May 2015

RE: Next steps of FPWD for Social API?

From: Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:32:56 +0000
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
CC: Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Message-ID: <b7cc849d6707479b9ea393d15e576273@XCH15-01-04.nw.nos.boeing.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ [mailto:perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org]
> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 2:06 AM
> To: Harry Halpin
> Cc: Amy G; Bassetti, Ann; public-socialweb@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Next steps of FPWD for Social API?
> Hi Harry,
> On 05/15/2015 09:29 PM, Harry Halpin wrote:
> > OK everyone,
> >
> > While I understand Tantek's skepticism, I think a document that helps
> > clarifies. In my experience, raising issues and edits around a single
> > document is often a pretty good way to make progress.
> +1

I agree that drafting a "straw horse" helps give a common place to start, to edit from. 

> >
> > I'll take a first stab at this next week in order to get a general
> > W3C-compliant outline and put it in the Github repo, and then I'll
> > setup Aaron and Jessica as editors (Amy - can you still help?). We can
> > discuss more on the Tuesday call, and also make sure the SoLiD
> > approach is well represented.
> During F2F I understood that Amy (and in few months together with Ann) will
> act as neutral editors. While editors of three other drafts will act as authors.
> Here I must admit that I don't understand well editor/author distinction...

You are correct, elf, that I volunteered (at least for when I retire at the end of the year). However, I don't think I have the technical expertise to lead the effort. For that, it'd be much better if Aaron, Jessica, Amy and whomever else are the primary editors. 

My best contribution can probably be to help edit from a "language" point-of-view -- meaning, to edit for clarity, good use of language, etc.  Since I am less technical that most of you, I am also probably a good test case, in terms of explaining the technical bits in a manner that others can understand.

> BTW can you please propose it for the agenda of our next telecon via wiki?
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-05-19

> Cheers!
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2015 16:33:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:17 UTC