- From: Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 21:51:48 +0100
- To: Nick Jennings <nick@silverbucket.net>
- Cc: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAF8MjMGRnez-bZbMM2bORhmg3PWmp8EDNg27HP3-Y=YmTT7e1w@mail.gmail.com>
I've just added state to my travel plan posts (rhiaro.co.uk/travel) where the value can be 'cancelled', 'rescheduled' ( http://rhiaro.co.uk/2015/06/1433882783) or 'missed' ( http://rhiaro.co.uk/2015/06/1435431067). The only effect of this being that cancelled, rescheduled or missed plans are displayed with a strikethrough, and rescheduled and missed plans may show a link to the plan they've been superceded by. (I don't want to delete changed plans, or just modify the times, because I'm keeping track of how much money/time I lose to misbooking or screwing up at catching public transport..). Also when I'm displaying minor posts on my site (like deletes, edits) I'd include 'Amy missed a train' etc among that, so potentially anyone expecting me could see what's going on without having to ask (because, of course, the best social web is anti-social). I don't explicitly store states for past, present and future, but on my /travel page I display travel plans and events sorted as so based on the start and end dates/times, according roughly to the heuristic James described earlier in the thread. States for 'cancelled' and 'rescheduled' are possibly also applicable to RSVPs and Events. Perhaps these are too domain specific to be in AS2 though, and should just be an extension. On 7 July 2015 at 09:19, Nick Jennings <nick@silverbucket.net> wrote: > For use in sockethub, all incoming activity streams are 'pending', > sockethub carries out the action, then the resulting response is either > completed or aborted/cancelled. So something along the `state` property > would be very useful. Currently I'm not using any property as all incoming > messages are assumed to be pending, and for outgoing, if there's an `error` > property with a string, then it's assumed to have failed. I'd love to see > something defined though. > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:55 AM Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> > wrote: > >> >> > On 30 Jun 2015, at 1:20 am, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Obviously, this is an imperfect model but given that Activities have, >> > for the most part, been used primarily to record Activities that have >> > already occurred, the rules haven't proven to be much of a problem. >> >> Ok, that makes sense…so perhaps just add to the Activity note section that >> the ‘state’ should be expressed using the date properties. >> >> Cheers... >> Renato Iannella >> Semantic Identity >> http://semanticidentity.com >> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 >> >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2015 20:52:37 UTC