- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:38:24 +0100
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>, public-socialweb@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2015 09:26 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 03:17 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
>> Elf Pavlik: I appreciate the effort, but I've been asking people
>> for a few weeks to review the requirements list as it was.
>> Everyone has read it in its previous form.
>>
>> I don't understand the format you made, and I need to lead a
>> discussion on it today. If we're /really/ lucky, we can approve
>> them today and move forward on getting proposals for a social
>> API. If we have to have everyone look at a brand new document,
>> we're in for at least another week of revisions.
>>
>> For these reasons, I've reverted the document to its previous
>> form. I copied the form you did to here:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Pelf/Social_API_requirements
>>
>> If you'd like to make changes to the substance -- adding new
>> requirements, e.g. -- great. But don't re-architect the entire
>> page within 24 hours of when we're supposed to approve it.
> Please accept my apologies Evan, not the best timing to change
> structure indeed!
>
> Could we maybe work a little on this together (remotely) tomorrow?
> Clearer structure can also help with linking requirements to
> relevant the *Use Cases* from IG as well as to implementations.
It seems that the main difference is that Elf is trying to use a
generic CRUD template, I guess assuming that LDP would make the most
sense.
Could just make a separate page Elf showing how Evan's current
requirements can be addressed by CRUD (and which ones are not
obviously able to be done in that way)?
cheers,
harry
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=CeHs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 20:38:34 UTC