- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:38:24 +0100
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>, public-socialweb@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2015 09:26 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > On 01/27/2015 03:17 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote: >> Elf Pavlik: I appreciate the effort, but I've been asking people >> for a few weeks to review the requirements list as it was. >> Everyone has read it in its previous form. >> >> I don't understand the format you made, and I need to lead a >> discussion on it today. If we're /really/ lucky, we can approve >> them today and move forward on getting proposals for a social >> API. If we have to have everyone look at a brand new document, >> we're in for at least another week of revisions. >> >> For these reasons, I've reverted the document to its previous >> form. I copied the form you did to here: >> >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Pelf/Social_API_requirements >> >> If you'd like to make changes to the substance -- adding new >> requirements, e.g. -- great. But don't re-architect the entire >> page within 24 hours of when we're supposed to approve it. > Please accept my apologies Evan, not the best timing to change > structure indeed! > > Could we maybe work a little on this together (remotely) tomorrow? > Clearer structure can also help with linking requirements to > relevant the *Use Cases* from IG as well as to implementations. It seems that the main difference is that Elf is trying to use a generic CRUD template, I guess assuming that LDP would make the most sense. Could just make a separate page Elf showing how Evan's current requirements can be addressed by CRUD (and which ones are not obviously able to be done in that way)? cheers, harry > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUx/c8AAoJEPgwUoSfMzqcSy0P/jd/A+i6nH9uvCgo4sMIYoyD z+gqs4I7Onth0VGmpOMeH0tGmAanJaG52Xm9g5jQX6zvngU8J4rhHyBIMGRpBBiU t4EfThjMfyHBVZ01gwjaMMDqeLeQAmMLM45fHKpViYexKBCQPIk2sECxvJfDdl5J /RYqJgQz9rUbYURpjYQQF5lZsvVVL/FhuXqUCBo5FrWlidacRfP8hHhu0mS6b+lE Kg1uw2xxICdXWTlmypu3ojeDKhrxiMbg8ug39V1R8dGhmHfDuFA7FEXkQOReXs0c 2ybfnyLiguJ4dqI2Nqazx8tfUZWYbs+Msp0BoR4Gb3MLnAb3spr7FppMKOEl5b0L FuBYQLa87B1IwIahML1YYsI/F2syUtuAalHBiCcQdSuUXmrafP5+QlHAB/pzLWfo ScwMEEnGon57fG33bSeW6PE4xkXObhbRBhKznoppqTwl8t0enE1zpjvq4DU5h13Q avR/qR4rB5qwwGQ3enadB6TMby0o6kWkRsQPCrcgW4fk0yEdXvNwOUTqy9x4Q7GB kFYmFfhGMVEy8B3RqPk405AV/dnO9zTAhIhsmt5oWgELXxo4ePDWTuanHJDuVzCN 3V4FL/IWxi57JVmcpVPTzeAo6b338gqybDh0t4hvedXc2wBF/xFeF+Vi5hXF9pgu M64TLxFhV272T1rEKd9V =CeHs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 20:38:34 UTC