W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > January 2015

Re: social-ACTION-28: Prepare working draft for publication based on http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html by jan 16, 2105

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:46:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CABP7RbcVqfTxpGZXz-t9-=eOHPg1rF51WFE-kr9_zOkvth79dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Cc: Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
There won't be time before the next drafts are published. Feel free to
submit issues or (even better) pull requests to fix any errors that you
uncover and I'll make sure those are updated for the next working draft
push.
On Jan 20, 2015 6:40 AM, "☮ elf Pavlik ☮" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
wrote:

> On 01/13/2015 07:27 PM, Social Web Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> > social-ACTION-28: Prepare working draft for publication based on
> http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html
> by jan 16, 2105
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/Social/track/actions/28
>
> I started updating my script which tests examples in spec, tracking it
> now in: https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/65
>
> Currently examples have errors! At least when comparing JSON-LD and
> Turtle. I can rather easily add checking also RDFa serialization.
>
> Also turtle in examples don't validate! I also will automate such checks...
>
> IMO we should get those examples to pass isomorphism checks among
> included serializations ASAP! Of course I offer my help for JSON-LD,
> Turtle and RDFa versions :)
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2015 14:47:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:14 UTC