Re: Sorting out User Stories

I suspect we will find that ambiguity in voting will not matter much.
I don't think we should want to throw any of these user stories away.  If a
user story was created it shows that someone is interested in it.  Anything
that does not make it this round should likely be reviewed in any future
iteration, it would also give a chance to rewrite some of the problematic
user stories.

Ben



On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
wrote:

> I think it has now become obvious that the meaning (semantic ;-) of a
> vote should better have been decided before the vote has taken place.
> But now we seem to have to live with the result.
>
> One major problem I see is that "-1" can mean very different things.
> In some cases it means that the voter considers the user story to be
> out of scope or bad and therefore is really against it. In other cases
> it means that the voter only is against consideration for the first
> version of the specification but likes it or is neutral regarding
> future versions.
>
> It leads to additional work but I think that this ambiguity of "-1"
> should be taken into account in the selection process.
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
>
>