- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 18:24:05 +0100
- To: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me>
- CC: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>, amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk>
- Message-ID: <54EA10B5.5090803@wwelves.org>
On 02/22/2015 06:04 PM, Ben wrote: > Getting tired of defending -1 votes. Just vote +1 it if you think its > important. Thats the point of voting isn't it? Your *question* (note your use of ?) gave me impression that you may assume limiting our work to deployment patterns promoted by IndieWeb community. I think we still need to properly document this topic to avoid confusion in a future. Also, even while I host only my own account as the only account, I still act as an admin of that server, so always we have role of server administrator, also in IndieWeb style deployments. It makes a lot of sense to me to provide means for people to report to me that they might find content published by me offending in some ways I simply couldn't foresee. Plain comments will not do the job here, since I may not keep up with all the possible comments and instead choose to prioritize notifications of someone flagging something published by me as inappropriate... Evan, should I add all those replies directly under Ben's *question* on a wiki page? IMO it may get confusing if we start getting in longer conversations there... > > Ben > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:49 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < > perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > >> Ahoy o/ >> >> I just noticed on User Stories page comments from Ben >> "-1. What server administrator? This is distributed, There may be none. >> — Ben Roberts" >> e.g. >> >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Contest_content_report >> >> >> I understand that IndieWeb community focuses on specific scenario where >> everyone hosts one's own account. At the same time I think that here we >> also take into account scenarios where one instance, managed by server >> admin(s), provides accounts for many people. We see it out in a wild >> with Diaspora, Friendica, Pump.io, MediaGoblin etc. >> >> Could we clarify + document that we stay on the same page which >> *includes* IndieWeb style of deployments but doesn't put such constraint >> on everyone? Not sure where to put it on a wiki, maybe something like >> "Deployment Consideration" page? >> >> BTW I also included in my exprimental drafts[1][2], concept of Terms of >> Service, which will come relevant here and will differ a lot from what >> we know in ecosystem with handful of services dominating ecosystem and >> expecting people to actually read ToS. >> >> Cheers! >> >> [1] http://w3c-social.github.io/soc-glossary/ >> [2] http://w3c-social.github.io/soc-arch/ >> >> >
Received on Sunday, 22 February 2015 17:24:31 UTC