- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:49:48 +0100
- To: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- CC: ben@thatmustbe.me, amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk>
Received on Sunday, 22 February 2015 16:50:15 UTC
Ahoy o/ I just noticed on User Stories page comments from Ben "-1. What server administrator? This is distributed, There may be none. — Ben Roberts" e.g. https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Contest_content_report I understand that IndieWeb community focuses on specific scenario where everyone hosts one's own account. At the same time I think that here we also take into account scenarios where one instance, managed by server admin(s), provides accounts for many people. We see it out in a wild with Diaspora, Friendica, Pump.io, MediaGoblin etc. Could we clarify + document that we stay on the same page which *includes* IndieWeb style of deployments but doesn't put such constraint on everyone? Not sure where to put it on a wiki, maybe something like "Deployment Consideration" page? BTW I also included in my exprimental drafts[1][2], concept of Terms of Service, which will come relevant here and will differ a lot from what we know in ecosystem with handful of services dominating ecosystem and expecting people to actually read ToS. Cheers! [1] http://w3c-social.github.io/soc-glossary/ [2] http://w3c-social.github.io/soc-arch/
Received on Sunday, 22 February 2015 16:50:15 UTC