Doesn't Reply in a Discussion give us threaded conversations for free?
http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Reply_in_a_discussion
Rob
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:50 PM, henry.story@bblfish.net <
henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
>
> > On 20 Feb 2015, at 13:48, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> wrote:
> >
> > So far I have read the whole set of user stories once. A very impressive
> > collection!
> >
> > I might have overlooked something, but I do not remember having seen a
> > story covering threaded conversations. Does anyone know if that is
> > covered or not?
> >
> > For those who do not know the term: That is essentially about commenting
> > on comments. Most mail clients provide tree like views for this and it
> > also was a well-known feature of NNTP clients. But it became less
> > popular when pictures of nice meals, cats etc. began to dominate
> postings.
> >
> > Threaded conversation is also closely related to meta-annotations.
> >
> > If that is not covered by a story then I would write one on the new Wiki
> > page which was created today.
>
> +1 for threaded conversations.
>
>
>
> Henry
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andreas
> >
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>
>
--
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305