- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:28:14 +0100
- To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Cc: Bill Looby <bill_looby@ie.ibm.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>, Elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
My guess is that this is what used to be grouped under "Developer Stories". It is something along the lines: 1. Conchita develops an Android client 2. During development she notices that people sometimes miss out data, so to give a better user experience she builds very light weight RDFS inferencing into her client to fill in the missing data > On 11 Feb 2015, at 18:10, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > hello bill. > > thanks for your response! > > On 2015-02-11 8:36 , Bill Looby wrote: >> I believe Activity Streams 1.0 at one stage allowed multiple verbs which >> addressed the issue below fairly simply but provided other complications >> (and so was removed). With json-ld types, the association is not held in >> the data itself so it's more complex to process. Definitely think this >> is an important story. > > thanks and yes, to me that would be an interesting aspect of how my API behaves. this is not making any claims as to how i can filter through the API (which may be out of scope for the spec/API), but in terms of behavior, this is a question that matters a lot for our scenarios. > > in AS2, there are different possibilities how this can play out: > > - we define the class relationship in the core vocabulary is meaningful for behavior and AS2 implementations must implement it that way, so whatever is a "like" has to treated in the same way as a "respond". > > - we define that class relationship in the core vocabulary is not meaningful for behavior and AS2 implementations must implement it that way, so whatever is a "like" is not a "respond". if a producer wants their "like" to be treated as a "repond", they have to label them both ways (i.e., give them two types). > > - it gets trickier for the "likealot" because we cannot assume that this verb is hardcoded into implementations. if we want it to be treated as a "like"/"respond", then we need to explain how that is supposed to happen in an ecosystem of AS implementations that we do not want to require to support JSON-LD and RDFS. > > cheers, > > dret. > > -- > erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 | > | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | > | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret | > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 17:28:45 UTC