Re: JRD, XRD Re: Webfinger

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 02/02/2015 12:05 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 11:46 AM, Harry Halpin wrote:
>> [please keep this cc'ed to Social Interest Group]
>> 
>> On 02/01/2015 09:59 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
>>> ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>>>> I would prefer not to put limitations of JRD upon our work,
>>>> and use webfinger *only* as a way to get equivalent http: /
>>>> https: URI for URIs using other schemes acct: , mailto: ,
>>>> xmpp: etc.
>>> 
>>> I had a look at the Webfinger specification.
>>> 
>>> JRD (JSON Resource Descriptor) does not look like something I
>>> want to use in the future. It is a JSON-formatted XRD document
>>> and has its own media type (application/jrd+json). And XRD
>>> (eXtensible Resource Descriptor) is "a simple generic format
>>> for describing and discovering resources".
>>> 
>>> Something like Webfinger but based on JSON-LD might be good,
>>> but that depends on it being in scope here.
>>> 
>>>> Then stating the actual relations (links/predicates) in
>>>> JSON-LD document representing particular resource.
>>> 
>>> +1
>> 
>> Note that WebFinger dropped XRD support, included the support for
>> the non-standard XRI class of identifers. It supports only JRD.
>> However, there is no reason why you couldn't use JSON-LD with
>> JRD:
> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=webfinger+json-ld for
> relevant conversations from webfinger standardization process e.g.
> 
> * 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/3vexx4nYjTa30pIQK_rqpBb2DjQ
>
> 
*
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/1wyqrPqpohpmSm5KfO0OkUjI_po
>
> 
> 
> 

Seems like apps-discuss@ietf.org is the perfect place to discuss
fixing any issues with JRD, including perhaps making a proper IETF
draft out of it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=D32U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 11:17:51 UTC