Re: a user liking a post

On 23 August 2015 at 23:38, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
wrote:

> On 08/23/2015 11:12 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > On 23 August 2015 at 21:14, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
> perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/23/2015 08:00 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> >>> If there's no currently reusable equivalent of
> >> http://ontologi.es/like#likes
> >>> in AS2 or another vocab, I think I'll stick to that until an
> alternative
> >>> presents itself.
> >>>
> >>> The former is already in use by openlink, so I think it makes sense to
> >>> reuse that, at this point in time.
> >>
> >> Makes sense! I see need for a strategy which allows people to start with
> >> all kind of independent vocabularies (AS2.0 extension if one prefers to
> >> see it this way) which later can converge in way which leaves clear
> >> upgrade path for machines. Some thoughts in recent IRC logs:
> >>
> >
> > Very good point.
> >
> > Some things can converge, some things cant.  For example, a system that
> is
> > "one to many" cannot converge with a system that is "one to one".
> >
> > One useful way to converge vocabularies is to use the (owl) sameAs
> > pattern.
>
> To my understanding for vocabulary terms on supposed to use
> * owl:equivalentClass
> * owl:equivalentProperty
> * rdfs:subClassOf
> * rdfs:subPropertyOf
>

yes, you are right!

what ive found lately is that interop is really hard, even if you are using
the same vocabs

So I think these tools will come into play much in the life cycle after
lots of interop testing, it will be interesting to see how things evolve


>
> Also in case of equivalent ones, and systems which prefer NOT to depend
> on run time inference. Migrating data (eg. publishing new revision of
> web resource at same URL) after discovery of
> http://schema.org/supersededBy in used vocabulary, sounds to me like a
> pragmatic way which allows everyone to start defining new terms very
> freely and than work on converging toward common ones *after* having
> some real world experience of using those new terms.
>
> I would like to see how p3k-food, p3k-drink and
> http://vocab.amy.so/blog.owl could get superseded by terms in more
> common vocabularies.
>
> http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2015-05-04/line/1430753015572
>
>
>
>
>
>
>