Re: social-ISSUE-45 (mf2jsonldconflicts): Conflicts between json-ld and mf2 examples [Activity Streams 2.0]

I read this as, for each part of AS2 represented by an example, can we
point to use cases from our own user stories and/or examples in the wild?

*> A) Can AS2 be improved to better represent pragmatic social web
publishing and consuming experience?*

If not, perhaps this part of AS2 is extraneous.

*> B) Are there real world use-cases implied by AS2 features that need
documentation as input for proposing new microformats2 properties (or
possibly objects)*

If yes, let us document this so that other communities (one of which being
mf2) may benefit, and the motivations driving the parts of AS2 become
clearer.

Doing this sounds like a lot of work, but valuable for strengthening AS2. I
suspect it would be duplication of a lot of the earlier work done to create
AS2 in the first place, so if anyone can point to documentation of that
process, or any early thinking, discussions, brainstorming etc, it would
really help. For those involved with AS1 and AS2, probably the contents of
AS2 seem logical and obvious, but until this is clearly documented I can
see the same questions/conversations happening over and over as new people
and ideas arrive.

Amy

On 10 August 2015 at 20:40, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 10 August 2015 at 20:37, Social Web Working Group Issue Tracker <
> sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> social-ISSUE-45 (mf2jsonldconflicts): Conflicts between json-ld and mf2
>> examples [Activity Streams 2.0]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/45
>>
>> Raised by: Benjamin Roberts
>> On product: Activity Streams 2.0
>>
>> As was mentioned by https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/44 there is a
>> disparity between several examples in AS2 between JSON-LD and MF2.
>>
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
>
>>
>> Examples should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis considering
>> A) Can AS2 be improved to better represent pragmatic social web
>> publishing and consuming experience?
>> B) Are there real world use-cases implied by AS2 features that need
>> documentation as input for proposing new microformats2 properties (or
>> possibly objects)
>> C) A combination of both A and B
>>
>
> This issue seems a little vague.
>
> Additionally, I am unsure I understand the implications of (B) "proposing
> new microformats2 properties".
>
>
>