revoting on changed user stories

Two issues here.

1. User stories consist of a title a url and a description.  There are some
in this group arguing that changing the title of a user story is not
changing user story.  It should be clear that this is not the case.  To
illustrate this point, consider renaming SWAT0 to the "Microblogging User
Story".  This would be a much more accurate name, since it was developed
for the original "open micro blogging".  It would be impossible to argue
that this is not a change.  I should think this is self evident, but if we
have to spend time debating this, so be it.


2. Once a user story is change, what is the next step.  Voting should be
reopened on the new user story for a period of time.  I suggest 2 weeks,
maybe 3 weeks if that suits better, as some people are on vacation in
august.  In fact in some user stories, there are specific objections to the
title.  After the new voting is closed it can then be put the correct
bucket.


In general im against changing the user stories, because it slows us down
unnecessarily, when IMHO the focus should be on interop, the social api and
implementations.  But if it's going happen, we need to have a process.