Re: To be Or noT To Be a Link Relation

Which argument are you referring to?
On Apr 28, 2015 11:54 AM, "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> you had an argument against removing the link relation during this
> teleconf that I did not understand.
> Where is the place where you defend that point most concicely so I can
> understand it better? There were a lot of posts recently on the subject.
>
> Henry
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>
>