- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:13:28 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Evan Prodromou <evan@fuzzy.io>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
> On 22 Apr 2015, at 17:16, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > > Evan, > > I'd like to get your input on this: > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/100 > > The idea is to remove the rel property from as:Link to avoid any > possible semantic confusion. I'm personally +-0 on this as I don't > have any particular issue with it but some others (elf, Henry, etc) > have raised some concerns. Since I know you've made use of links and > rels in pump.io I wanted to get your feedback. I am fine with that as far as it goes. My issues is with the way the atom xml `<link` element is being modelled. In short my argument is that there is no need for it once one moves to RDF. ( this was not clear 10 years ago, but by looking at various specs it has become clear that it is just a reification mechanism. Detailed argument on that is https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/98#issuecomment-94702056 and the problems that the current Link class generates is most explained in detail https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/100#issuecomment-95253148 Henry > > - James > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 20:14:02 UTC