- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:02:39 +0200
- To: "Crawford, Mark" <mark.crawford@sap.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2014 05:47 PM, Crawford, Mark wrote: > Evan wrote: > >> There has been some talk on telecons and the mailing list about >> developing a list of use cases for our three efforts (syntax, >> client-to-server API, server-to-server API). > >> I don't want to do this. > >> First, because there are other people doing it. I believe part of >> the charter of the IG is to develop use cases for social >> standards. The social headlights group also developed use cases >> for social standards previously.* Repeating this exercise in the >> working group is probably redundant. > > Correct. THE ONE identified deliverable in the Social IG charter > is to develop the Use Case Report. The IG Use Case Report is > intended to be all encompassing and address many aspects of social > to include setting the framework for developing the Social > Architecture/Standards Landscape report. My questions around use > cases in the WG are simply: > > * which use cases do we need to identify to ensure the work we are > doing will result in a useful W3C recommendation that will achieve > an acceptable level of adoption in the social space * how can we > quickly capture relevant use cases so we can continue on with the > recommendation work without negatively impacting delivery? +1. Let's move use-cases over to the Social Interest Group. The discussion there can also be much more wide-spanning than the deliverable-focussed WG discussion. > > Best Regards, Mark > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUIEgfAAoJEPgwUoSfMzqcCWkP/2DJduviLw5NkGrvHNmoqNTb EW33LF0dl4R6YtY7Ywhx9EaJ88yi7PtpO8oQuS2cGZNbCBGfz4q1TRQ19NMVy+i0 MdKtBVlcGK9H9iHJQjXZXBlkEZdvtRDX8mtskL5fnaEPW/w2b8oJKY12umjtLv3w gkNyoVkXxP8gH8S2CRYkh/dfuSD0xSXZENrKxeAp+3IEHY/RAGwXpW/ffcv4LUY/ ZFIHhd5A+fBe/5PqBihIR74EhaMcnIZ1Fu3skoIMzsamI6IK8sTB2aG6RAgZ991J yUoq5QvyvqDwR+gpMlIFLGxvwQS11qO7AAoNgVHlPUAWb3GRyBSw8aihHX6ETK+U P8JMSd1j4/NyeA0gjt/dJ1QA1G+2qcjyEEJTkt4wUASuAZSH1FRSt2haOPfBYOwL 1VXIt+Cq9RyPm6hg10jyDfKoZp/08rcaQ7y2mPxkpg/yBHEg63hWeYVzFjnZe+75 HiNHXHDsic8X7yA67jmuZ3aSwBNfID48XOLYx8OtM858iyY89aAqGL/B78g4lpIU BdOKyvYDMTsZL98VDMlexQZLFbAQlR+GsWp9qbBGMKbZLHkw0uIwNU3XzRVCqkEx 4QFx+JQ1PRg3c7XVTjA6kyFIVKz1WtXPzthohxUrIsvaGklmGc+R1TXr0xuEkM2f TmPKCDCB/kBDP6l6xPzI =Q6Et -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 16:02:48 UTC