- From: Crawford, Mark <mark.crawford@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:47:45 +0000
- To: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Evan wrote: >There has been some talk on telecons and the mailing list about >developing a list of use cases for our three efforts (syntax, >client-to-server API, server-to-server API). >I don't want to do this. >First, because there are other people doing it. I believe part of the >charter of the IG is to develop use cases for social standards. The >social headlights group also developed use cases for social standards >previously.* Repeating this exercise in the working group is probably >redundant. Correct. THE ONE identified deliverable in the Social IG charter is to develop the Use Case Report. The IG Use Case Report is intended to be all encompassing and address many aspects of social to include setting the framework for developing the Social Architecture/Standards Landscape report. My questions around use cases in the WG are simply: * which use cases do we need to identify to ensure the work we are doing will result in a useful W3C recommendation that will achieve an acceptable level of adoption in the social space * how can we quickly capture relevant use cases so we can continue on with the recommendation work without negatively impacting delivery? Best Regards, Mark
Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 15:48:17 UTC