- From: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: 21 Sep 2014 21:47:33 +0200
- To: "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net>, "Erik Wilde" <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Cc: "Elf Pavlik" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, public-socialweb@w3.org
henry.story@bblfish.net wrote: > The point is that now we have JSON-LD the syntax for JSON has allready been agreed upon and is widely adopted. > All that remains to be agreed upon is the vocabulary for the use cases we want to solve. Then the work is done. > There is not an additional job to determine the syntax. > > This removes a huge burden on development of a convention, which is great, because there is a lot to do. +1 There is still a lot of work to do regarding alignment of Activity Streams 2.0 with JSON-LD but that work is more about designing vocabulary than syntax. Cheers, Andreas
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2014 19:48:12 UTC