- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 00:44:43 +0100
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
On 10/31/2014 06:41 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On 31 Okt 2014 at 18:15, Crawford, Mark wrote: > Topic 3 (vocabulary for verbs/activity types) >> response: I would prefer we take a more formal approach. > > Has it been discussed to simply recommend the reuse of Schema.org for this? There went a lot of work in the design of their actions hierarchy and if possible I would rather try to avoid reinventing the wheel here and instead focus on other aspects. +1 referencing http://schema.org/Action a recommended registry also with solid use cases we can contribute via public-voabs w3c list
Received on Friday, 31 October 2014 23:46:52 UTC