Re: Activity Streams URI Namespace

Easier to remember yes, but a bit more difficult to manage across versions.
I'd rather not draw out that debate yet again tho. I think we should just
put it to a straw poll next week at tpac.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, 1:12 PM Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
wrote:

> On Thursday, October 23, 2014 5:47 PM, James M Snell wrote:
> > The First Public Working Draft *should* publish today. Looking forward
> > to next steps, we need to decide on the official Namespace URI that
> > we'll be using. To this point we've been using
> > http://activitystrea.ms/2.0/, which is not a W3C controlled domain.
> >
> > For the Activity and Actions vocabulary, what I propose is using:
> >
> >   http://www.w3.org/2014/activitystreams#
>
> While the exact URL structure doesn't matter at all from a technical point
> of view, I would strongly prefer to omit the year. It makes it much more
> difficult to remember those URLs
>
>   http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
>
> Are very bad examples. So, I would propose to simply stick to
>
>    http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#
>
> Much easier to remember.
>
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>
>
>