W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > October 2014

Re: TPAC: Schema.org and Social WG ( legal / technical )

From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:52:45 +0000
Message-ID: <CABP7Rbeo1EyZ6foJG+cD_u+1dYDvnRnjYYd0-OBD+6TY9-Hxpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, public-socialweb@w3.org
Like Sam, I have absolutely no interest in talking about anything but the
technical aspects. That said, the governance issue is relevant in that we
have specific use cases in mind for Actions but we cannot implement against
a model that can be changed at any time at a whim. We require a stable,
vendor-neutral target to implement against and that's what I'll be
advocating for at the break-out.

- James

On Thu Oct 23 2014 at 7:46:44 AM Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 10/23/2014 01:42 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> > On 10/23/2014 12:40 PM, Harry Halpin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/23/2014 11:39 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> >>> On 10/23/2014 01:30 AM, James M Snell wrote:
> >>>> I'm planning on attending the BOF.
> >>> Great! I let myself add your name to wiki as interested in this session
> >>> and will also notify Sam.
> >>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014/SessionIdeas#Schema.org_and_Social_WG
> >>>
> >>> Harry, do you have some strategy for how to create space supporting
> both
> >>> legal and technical discussions? Should we also add time information to
> >>> the session description, I remember you sending note mentioning 9AM.
> >>
> >> It's an informal discussion.
> >>
> >> There will likely not be remote participation for the 9:15 AM session,
> >> as they are done small-group style. We'll take notes though and send
> >> them out.
> > How about having separate legal and technical conversations. Do you see
> > possibility of having legal from 9:15AM for 1-1.5h and then technical
> > 1-1.5h after short break? So far it looks like only R.V. Guha will come
> > from schema.org 'side', to my understanding with more focus on legal
> issues.
> >
> > I think with some coordination we could also create possibility for
> > discussing technical issues with Sam Goto, IMO he does solid research
> > for example in field of hypermedia controls[1] plus most likely have the
> > best understanding of current requirements and direction for
> > schema.org/Action
>
> We will have only a limited number of slots for break-out sessions.
>
> I think we're mostly focus on technical aspects as schema.org's legal
> situation re royalty-free got a lot better recently, so if Sam can come
> that would be great. However, TPAC registration is pretty full so Guha
> might have to proxy him.
>
>
> >
> > [1] http://blog.sgo.to/2014/03/rows-and-idls.html
> >
>
>
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 14:53:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:13 UTC