- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 11:19:33 +0200
- To: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Aloha o/ I added to wiki page of our next meetings 2 *proposals* for agenda points: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-10-07#Agenda * ActivityStreams 2.0 compatibility with AS1.0 and JSON-LD * IndieWeb stack support of JSON (JSON-LD) Of course if we see other topics more important I don't expect anyone dedicating time to any of those which I just proposed. I see those topics possibly received by some of group members as hard or even controversial. Still IMO if we can clarify our positions on them it could make our further work more straight forward. Also opportunity of F2F meeting during TPAC can offer more humane (comparing to mailing list, irc e-tc.) environment to search for clearing out various differences within the group. Even if we don't manage to find agreement on any of those points in next weeks, at least we can understand each other position and motivations better. I also create issues on github while reviewing latest draft of AS2.0 https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues Looks like currently very few people watch this repository :( https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/watchers (BTW glad to see @danbri and @scor among people who do watch it!) I hope that everyone still enjoys great weekend and we all can continue our work next week with big dose of enthusiasm and optimism \o/ Mahalo :)
Received on Sunday, 5 October 2014 09:21:47 UTC