- From: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:59:35 -0500
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54624E87.7000001@e14n.com>
On 2014-11-09 05:12 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > First of all I see very little engagement from IndieWeb community on > mailing list and in github issues. I think we have a lot of individuals involved with IndieWeb in this group; maybe you and they can think of more mechanisms for liasing? > > Second, I have impression of our current work very Activity Streams > centric. While I find activities a very important *part* of social > networking, I also recognize much border spectrum to it. We have three deliverables for this working group: http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter.html They are: * A social data syntax * A client API * A federation protocol The last two are expected to use the first one. So, yes, we are concentrating on Activity Streams because it is our first deliverable. > > Third and for now last issue. Various other W3C groups work on IMO > relevant technologies. [...] I would like us to try come up with a better strategy on how > we can leverage all that work which people currently do in other groups. Can you explain how those different technologies are applicable to our deliverables? -Evan
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 18:00:29 UTC