Re: ActivityStreams Schema: Hierarchy of Types

> On 8 Nov 2014, at 09:43, Owen Shepherd <> wrote:
> You cite exclusively <>, which we have excluded for the following reasons:
> <> is not produced by any standards organization, nor does it have any defined open contributor model. While the organizations behind <> do accept contributions, they hold veto powers over any modifications
> <> alone is not sufficient for our use cases
> Several of us find the technical quality of <> lacking. The design of <> contains numerous things which are illogical and badly designed.
+1 Very Good Points.

Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 02:07:54 UTC