- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:07:12 +1000
- To: Owen Shepherd <owen.shepherd@e43.eu>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 02:07:54 UTC
> On 8 Nov 2014, at 09:43, Owen Shepherd <owen.shepherd@e43.eu> wrote: > > You cite exclusively Schema.org <http://schema.org/>, which we have excluded for the following reasons: > Schema.org <http://schema.org/> is not produced by any standards organization, nor does it have any defined open contributor model. While the organizations behind Schema.org <http://schema.org/> do accept contributions, they hold veto powers over any modifications > Schema.org <http://schema.org/> alone is not sufficient for our use cases > Several of us find the technical quality of Schema.org <http://schema.org/> lacking. The design of Schema.org <http://schema.org/> contains numerous things which are illogical and badly designed. +1 Very Good Points. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 02:07:54 UTC