- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:55:16 +0100
- To: <public-socialweb@w3.org>
On Wednesday, November 05, 2014 9:38 AM, Owen Shepherd wrote: > I’m in favour of us defining our own types for the core elements because > > • Requiring people to remember that its’ foam:Person and > org:Organization and … will quickly get confusing. The core types we > need should be part of the specification, whether that be the AS2 > specification or some “AS2 Base Schema” > > Put simply, non JSON-LD processors shouldn’t need to know about card > or foaf or schema.org unless they specifically wish to do so (i.e. > they wish to take advantage of some features from there) Just to make this clear: If we define the JSON-LD context properly and decide on *a* vocabulary (instead of just recommending some) people neither need to remember a prefix nor need non-JSON-LD processors care about this. Let's first model the abstract concepts we need and then see whether there's enough overlap with an existing vocabulary to justify its use. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 16:55:46 UTC