- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 11:51:14 -0700
- To: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 18:51:41 UTC
Can you provide a bit more detail as to why? On Nov 1, 2014 10:25 AM, "☮ elf Pavlik ☮" <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Seeing constructive discussions about as:Verb & as:verb, I would like to > propose *short* discussion about as:Link during our next call. > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-11-04#proposal:_remove_as:Link > > IMO removing it will make modeling more straight forward and make the > whole spec a bit simpler. > > Some of the past conversations available in github issue: > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/24 > > Thanks! > >
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 18:51:41 UTC