- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 09:57:28 -0700
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: Goix Laurent Walter <laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it>, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, Owen Shepherd <owen.shepherd@e43.eu>, public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABP7RbfcWoaMmt23=bUSoUZJv74D22MiV0SGmmhwHBUzc-132g@mail.gmail.com>
To be honest, I've yet to see a reasonable use case for an XML AS format. On Aug 3, 2014 9:53 AM, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 08/03/2014 06:02 PM, Erik Wilde wrote: > > hello james. > > > > On 2014-07-31, 10:32 , James M Snell wrote: > >> FWIW, AS2 does not *re-base* itself on JSON-LD, it aligns with > >> JSON-LD. It's a critical difference. > > > > i think this will get interesting when it comes to defining an > > extension model. what was great about AS1 was that it had both an > > XML and a JSON syntax, so it was useful for both communities. once > > you subscribe to some layer higher than that, it gets a bit > > trickier to have a well-defined domain-based extension model, > > without resulting in rather horrible structures in one of the > > underlying syntaxes. > > > > i tried to work on an AS2 XML encoding for a little while > > (analogous to http://activitystrea.ms/specs/atom/1.0/), because it > > might be helpful to also serve the XML/Atom community. but it gets > > rather tricky to translate AS2's "alignment" with JSON-LD into > > reasonable XML constructs. that's because as an XML user, you'd > > like to see XML's/Atom's extension model to be used rather than > > some more complicated way of folding what's required by JSON-LD > > into some generic XML mapping. > > > > i think it wold be important to discuss whether an XML syntax is a > > requirement. if it is, my guess is that this will have some > > implications for how much layered models such as JSON-LD can be > > used, and where the line has to be drawn to avoid dependencies on > > their implicit models. > > Actually, according to the charter only a JSON-based syntax is a > requirement. The WG can of course have an XML syntax, but the focus on > should be on JSON. > > cheers, > harry > > > > > cheers, > > > > dret. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT3mj7AAoJEPgwUoSfMzqc3ZgP/18CtByvXUvOtOsh02Cdchdm > 6nnl4ZxgonPjDPpi2T+FzfMpmqCu0rwdBvcE2EKI0zqsKlMQi/5eUezrWTzhoOuM > GHFKnHdDCGRDtUQ9DCQFARFUUh3GL7aKnHcFghaZVtF8abgNkbo0CZg41lw+vNxE > YaOcafX0cDEFqVN+zbeezXknEwjjg6g8+A4KLgssA+0eYF0ilVQbqaY8rt6kD+Bj > TllNmAfvfpIrhn5gViD3EfFz1kPeR7N+1xS2S9Ri02NH/Ep3B0wvOXP3IB0iVvbv > dxqFlT6nNiirKmxjZO9oaXcfesq7ufDZM0EChAPirWlxnwFWDrfdjhdgE3MnqbxT > Uv5PGV6UT8N2RTpdCGLGUo8e4H8P/7noRc61FKPjiQ4MEqq/Fx1CMzsTwFeQgLUT > 0Cp0u7R1aPlmINUhDqDw489jAmm2wNg5EvhCrO9Qs3RIXIxfaaQXDT4ld+ExiuGk > /WK0LpbOknrScTHJrEb3lVONN967YK0I0isE8LLWRfVR7ttZtK4UzqxGiXAG3zAh > nHg2qOzIMLnWCp1fy4XCY4Z7VSvs/xJYLVnPRb3z9B6QIpXv2nLGW9hSlv9n7+jc > +spwFwgNNplXlzirkPNhcoOL/mYg62VMU6O5OOFI40vlKruMaW4qBw5XLgh2xAHL > 5eCxB/z7EiquhosRffCq > =RDgo > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2014 16:57:55 UTC