- From: Alberto Manuel <bpm.tst@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 17:20:08 +0100
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMR6YEZvFff_1u8GBLHmHttFLzfEd8YYS=O5N3r631f9_UkrFw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all: Regarding the challenge *Use cases, requirements, scenarios, and block diagrams* once that that there is work in progress I seems to me fruitful to let the Social Business Community Group to pick the work from the Social Headlights and mature it. Regards. 2012/5/21 Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> > Here is a summary of the discussion for those that were unable to make > the call. > > As background, the social networking task force was designed to be a > short-term task force. It had two major checkpoints, to develop a report > for the AC meeting last week (in which we received Member input relative to > W3C and social networking) and to prepare for W3C's internal planning > meeting (Woods meeting) in mid-July in which W3M decides where we need to > add resources for next year. Accordingly, the major topic on today's call > was what (if any) additional work needs to be done to get ready for the > Woods meeting; and what venue should be used for continuing work. > > (Also a factor is the travel schedule of our taskforce chair (me) who is > traveling much of June and in particular has many conflicts with our > standard Monday meeting time including 28 May (US holiday), 4 June (on > plane to China), 11 June (Japan), 25 June (offsite MIT meeting), and 2 July > (vacation).) > > *1. Fall workshop (jointly sponsored)*. We reviewed the fact that the AC > breakout expressed strong support for this workshop - based (among other > things) on the work on use case and requirements. However, we determined > that "task force mode" was not the right way to develop this. This is > especially because in the recommendations (see slide 8 of the third > attachment) there needs to be careful discussion with industry players (not > all of whom are in W3C) on the technical scope and on their involvement. > Accordingly, next steps were assigned to the team. Anyone interested in > participation, please let me know. > > *2. Social apps enabled through Browser assists.* This interesting idea > discussed in the attached charts assumes that browsers could access > personal data in social sites. The major AC feedback was a concern that > Terms and conditions (for social sites) might prevent this from happening > (at least automatically). This is something that W3C staff counsel should > look at. If we determine that this is not a problem, then this probably > becomes a candidate topic for the fall workshop. > > *3. Use cases, requirements, scenarios, and block diagrams.* We were > unclear about the best way to proceed with this work. It seems unlikely > that the work can be completed in task force mode since there is a defined > end date to the task force and much work remains to boil this down. On the > other hand, we continue to see good contributions (such as Alberto's latest > addition to the thread). We discussed the following ideas to continue the > work: > > 1. Give the Social Business CG "first right of refusal" to be the > place to continue the work. On the one hand, there has already been > overlap of contribution. So it is logical for a CG (which does not have > such a limited time) to pick up the task force work. On the other hand, > the scope of the block diagram is broader than Social Business. > 2. Spawn a new CG to focus on use case, requirements, scenarios, and > block diagrams for social networking overall. > 3. Continue discussion on this mailing list > 4. Continue in task force mode and see how far we get by July. > > My personal sense is that we should do (1), possibly leading to (2) - but > we agreed on the call to poll the task force participants. Please provide > your input. > Given the scheduling issues (mentioned above), and the assignment of > "workshop" and "browser assists" to the team, we also concluded that this > was probably the final task force call. Of course, if we decide to > continue "block diagram" in task force mode - we would have additional > calls. > > Thanks for your participation and please provide your input. > > Jeff > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Agenda for next Social > networking task force meeting: 21 May, 10AM ET - noon. Resent-Date: Wed, > 16 May 2012 16:58:10 +0000 Resent-From: public-socialweb@w3.org Date: Wed, > 16 May 2012 12:57:20 -0400 From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> <jeff@w3.org> To: > public-socialweb@w3.org <public-socialweb@w3.org><public-socialweb@w3.org> > > Here are the particulars for Monday's call. > > Zakim Information > > Team_(SocNet) > Monday, 21 May 14:00-16:00 UTC (10:00am-12:00pm Boston local) > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7621 ("SOC1") > > Agenda > > 1. Debrief from AC readout > - Ann/Jeff slides, fyi attached > - Steve slides, fyi, attached > - Summary report from breakout to AC, fyi, attached. > > 2. Next steps > - Fulfilling the AC mandate to create high quality joint workshops > - Discussion of the best way to continue block diagram work > - In task force > - In CG > - Part of workshop prep > > 3. Schedule for next calls > - 28 May, holiday in US > - Jeff trip to Asia > - Final readout at "Woods" meeting on 12 July. > > Jeff > > > -- Alberto Manuel http://ultrabpm.wordpress.com/ http://pt.linkedin.com/in/albertomanuel
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 16:20:59 UTC