- From: Alberto Manuel <bpm.tst@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:19:15 +0100
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMR6YEaXwx93tUogrn+4TcdJTJXV8zS-m=_v-K82L73+V2t2=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all: My apologies for missing the call. I got confused my the meeting hours posted in the wiki. Then I realized it was referring April 23rd meeting. 2012/5/17 Alberto Manuel <bpm.tst@gmail.com> > Hi all: > > I would like to add this contribution before this weeks meeting, but other > results had to be achieved first, apart from that could introduce entropy > close to the event and I did not had some clear definitions about the > diagram. > > I made an update (not a re-engineering), witch I propose for discussion, > based on: > > > 1. A snapshot of how social interaction occurs between organizations > and where each block sits, without talking about technology and approaches > / methods. > 2. One of the things I think is missing is bringing clarification > about what each part of the block means and improve the each block name or > tag. > 3. On the other hand some of each block components where, probably (or > not), sitting in the wrong block. > > > > 1. *Snapshot* : Social interaction is done within two boundaries: > 1. Personal (me and my family; me and my friends, me and my > community); > 2. Enterprise (me and my colleagues, me and my customers, me and my > suppliers, me and my peers ... ); > 3. Every human has an identity and act ("socialize") regarding the > environment he is action with. I just made a diagram to show how this fits > together. > 2. *Clarification about each part of the block*. Each time I look > to the diagram, some block definitions seems to overlap. Still is very easy > to be in my position looking to diagram from the outside, as someone that > came from the Social Business Community Group, than someone like all of you > that did all the work and somehow can be stuck on words. For the sake of > the members I will follow from upper/left corner to the lower/right corner. > 1. Sharing / Collaboration : Collaboration was being used together > with the News feed. > 1. Sharing is: Accepting an object to be shared in order others > can take action if they want to. The object can be a document, a video ... > Thus under this category I kept all the object types except: > 1. Moved Microblog to Messaging block, because it's a type of > messaging; > 2. Deleted Presence, because it's part of the About the > Human. Presence, as I understood is about if you are online / offline ... > 3. Moved Workflow and Task to Collaboration because we do not > share workflow like we share a document. > 2. Messaging: > 1. Deleted mobile. Mobile is a device type like desktop, unless > it means other thing. > 2. Both in this category and Sharing I left a note about other > type of objects and messaging mechanisms that can be used by disabled > people that we are forgetting to include. I apologize form the term > disabled. I don't remember other. > 3. Moved Forward / reply to Reactions under Comments. Sending an > e-mail is an asynchronous messaging type, where you can Comment by Replying > or Forwarding (or do nothing and archive or delete). > 3. Group Dynamics: > 1. Merged the actions to manage a group under Group Management. > 4. Collaboration: > 1. Received two categories that came from Sharing. > 5. Reactions: > 1. Made an update in the Comments category as indicated in the > Messaging block. > 6. Ubiquitous attributes: > 1. Not catching what the first categories mean, still I think is > better to create the Search and Analytic block. > 7. About the human: > 1. Added Reputation : Perceived evaluation taken by members of > the social graph. > 2. Where security sits? I see access control in the Social > graph. Is the same thing? > > See attached file. > > Regards. > > -- > Alberto Manuel > http://ultrabpm.wordpress.com/ > http://pt.linkedin.com/in/albertomanuel > > -- Alberto Manuel http://ultrabpm.wordpress.com/ http://pt.linkedin.com/in/albertomanuel
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 15:20:10 UTC