- From: Alberto Manuel <bpm.tst@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:19:15 +0100
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMR6YEaXwx93tUogrn+4TcdJTJXV8zS-m=_v-K82L73+V2t2=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all:
My apologies for missing the call. I got confused my the meeting hours
posted in the wiki. Then I realized it was referring April 23rd meeting.
2012/5/17 Alberto Manuel <bpm.tst@gmail.com>
> Hi all:
>
> I would like to add this contribution before this weeks meeting, but other
> results had to be achieved first, apart from that could introduce entropy
> close to the event and I did not had some clear definitions about the
> diagram.
>
> I made an update (not a re-engineering), witch I propose for discussion,
> based on:
>
>
> 1. A snapshot of how social interaction occurs between organizations
> and where each block sits, without talking about technology and approaches
> / methods.
> 2. One of the things I think is missing is bringing clarification
> about what each part of the block means and improve the each block name or
> tag.
> 3. On the other hand some of each block components where, probably (or
> not), sitting in the wrong block.
>
>
>
> 1. *Snapshot* : Social interaction is done within two boundaries:
> 1. Personal (me and my family; me and my friends, me and my
> community);
> 2. Enterprise (me and my colleagues, me and my customers, me and my
> suppliers, me and my peers ... );
> 3. Every human has an identity and act ("socialize") regarding the
> environment he is action with. I just made a diagram to show how this fits
> together.
> 2. *Clarification about each part of the block*. Each time I look
> to the diagram, some block definitions seems to overlap. Still is very easy
> to be in my position looking to diagram from the outside, as someone that
> came from the Social Business Community Group, than someone like all of you
> that did all the work and somehow can be stuck on words. For the sake of
> the members I will follow from upper/left corner to the lower/right corner.
> 1. Sharing / Collaboration : Collaboration was being used together
> with the News feed.
> 1. Sharing is: Accepting an object to be shared in order others
> can take action if they want to. The object can be a document, a video ...
> Thus under this category I kept all the object types except:
> 1. Moved Microblog to Messaging block, because it's a type of
> messaging;
> 2. Deleted Presence, because it's part of the About the
> Human. Presence, as I understood is about if you are online / offline ...
> 3. Moved Workflow and Task to Collaboration because we do not
> share workflow like we share a document.
> 2. Messaging:
> 1. Deleted mobile. Mobile is a device type like desktop, unless
> it means other thing.
> 2. Both in this category and Sharing I left a note about other
> type of objects and messaging mechanisms that can be used by disabled
> people that we are forgetting to include. I apologize form the term
> disabled. I don't remember other.
> 3. Moved Forward / reply to Reactions under Comments. Sending an
> e-mail is an asynchronous messaging type, where you can Comment by Replying
> or Forwarding (or do nothing and archive or delete).
> 3. Group Dynamics:
> 1. Merged the actions to manage a group under Group Management.
> 4. Collaboration:
> 1. Received two categories that came from Sharing.
> 5. Reactions:
> 1. Made an update in the Comments category as indicated in the
> Messaging block.
> 6. Ubiquitous attributes:
> 1. Not catching what the first categories mean, still I think is
> better to create the Search and Analytic block.
> 7. About the human:
> 1. Added Reputation : Perceived evaluation taken by members of
> the social graph.
> 2. Where security sits? I see access control in the Social
> graph. Is the same thing?
>
> See attached file.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Alberto Manuel
> http://ultrabpm.wordpress.com/
> http://pt.linkedin.com/in/albertomanuel
>
>
--
Alberto Manuel
http://ultrabpm.wordpress.com/
http://pt.linkedin.com/in/albertomanuel
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 15:20:10 UTC