- From: Michael Vogel <heluecht@pirati.ca>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:06:19 +0100
- To: public-socialweb-comments@w3.org
Hi! I just had a look at the vocabulary: http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams-vocabulary/ For the content it says: "A natural language description of the object content. HTML markup, including visual elements such as images, MAY be included." I see a problem with this. If it contains HTML elements then linebreaks shouldn't be respected. But if it contains only plain text then linebreaks have to be respected. You can't simply do a detection since it could be possible that you had an implementation that uses only text - but someone put an HTML element into the text as part of a conversation. I would suggest an additional content-type value. Michael
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 08:06:47 UTC