- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:24:51 +0100
- To: Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, public-social-web-talk@w3.org
Hi Christine, 2009/1/23 Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>: > > I'm a little confused here. > > Earlier today we were discussing scopes and frameworks. I missed that. > Now we've moved off and are taking names. If your (Harry) question is "are > there enough people here to do good work on many topics and to do the work > in multiple groups?" I think the answer from the past hour is there is a lot > of excitement, a lot of experts monitoring this list and a LOT to do. Definitely. > Unfortunately, no social networking operators and, with the exception of Tim > Anglade, we don't have anyone who is building platforms for social > networking today. We do, there are several companies working in the semweb space that are here before we start, there is definite interest from other companies and groups. > Why would we want/need to limit our scope to data portability and/or > semantic web now? I personally think the scope should be limited to achievable targets for the next year, the demographic of the people involved being secondary. > Maybe I'm missing a key element. Maybe, probably not, please expand on your doubts. Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 18:25:27 UTC