- From: Jeff Sonstein <jeffs@it.rit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:52:19 -0500
- To: public-social-web-talk@w3.org
On Jan 23, 2009, at 11:43 AM, public-social-web-talk@w3.org wrote: > 1) Who would join the Social Web XG? Please add if you are a W3C > member > or not, and if your organization would join W3C. I am RIT's W3C AC rep and I would join > 2) Would you prefer one or two XGs? One XG focused on interoperability > between exisiting work on the social web, and another focused on Best > Practices? Or should these be done as one XG? 2 groups as interop is a big issue all by itself > 3) Regardless of one or two XGs, different telecons but same > listserv to > facilitate communication? Or one telecon? diff telecons but same listserv might make sense until "things shake out" (activity level, tech discussion level, etc) jeffs -- "The price we pay for the growth in egalitarianism offered by the Internet is the decentralised access to unedited stories. In this medium, contributions by intellectuals lose their power to create a focus." - Jürgen Habermas - ============ Prof. Jeff Sonstein http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/ http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/ http://chw.rit.edu/blog/ http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/emailDisclaimer.html
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 16:53:05 UTC