Re: ACTION-6: Setup workflow for 'sheparding' User Stories from WG (github)

Hi all! Many thanks to elf for taking the initiative to accelerate our work on user stories. He has essentially mirrored the github setup that the Social WG is using, so we will have a better way of communicating and tracking who does what with user stories.

Please take some time before next Wed. to:


1. Select a user story from the "Minor Objections" category on this W3C wiki page. elf is working the User Profile Management story and I will be working with the Groups story.
2. Go to this github page and create an issue for the story. Existing issues can be viewed here.
3. Contact anyone who registered a -1 vote for that user story and work to understand their objection. Our goal is to remove those so we can move more stories into the "Entirely Positive" or "Entirely Positive of Positive Neutral" categories. It may also be helpful to understand concerns of those who voted 0 on the story.
4. Record outcomes in github, under the Issue you started.


Please select and act on a user story before next Wed., when the IG meets again. If possible, do it this weekend! We have some positive momentum at the moment regarding use cases/user stories, and I would love to either maintain or accelerate that.


If you have any questions, read elf's note below, then contact either him or me.


Thanks!


Larry

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Larry Hawes, Principal
Dow Brook Advisory Services
E: larry@dowbrook.com
P: 978-238-8534







---- On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:08:12 -0400 ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote ---- 

On 03/25/2015 05:44 PM, Social Interest Group Issue Tracker wrote: 
> ACTION-6: Setup workflow for 'sheparding' User Stories from WG (github) 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/Social/InterestGroup/track/actions/6 
> 
> Assigned to: Pavlik elf 
> 
> 
> On product: Use-case and Requirements 
 
I just explained it to Larry and Daniel during Use Case TF telecon 
 
I started draft of a document based on equivalent one from LDP WG 
( http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp-ucr/ ) 
 
Github repository: https://github.com/w3c-social/soc-ucr 
Preview: http://w3c-social.github.io/soc-ucr/ 
 
We start from wiki page with 'sorted' links to stories 
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/Sorting_user_stories 
 
I already included in a draft ones from 'Entirely Positive' section. Now 
we start picking stories from 'Minor Objections'. Everyone can pick 1-2 
of them and create Issue for it in 
https://github.com/w3c-social/soc-ucr/issues 
Please send me over p.m your github handles so I can add you to 
w3c-social organization. This way you can assign yourself to issues your 
created, manage labels etc. 
 
I recommend github since it provides most practical venue where WG and 
IG participants can collaborate with dealing with mailing lists and W3C 
tracker permissions. Also members representing IndieWebCamp don't 
participate in mailing lists and it looks like biggest number of 
objections comes from them. 
 
Please see issue for story 'Profile Management' as an example 
https://github.com/w3c-social/soc-ucr/issues/1 
 
1. It links to original story in a wiki and @mention of author 
2. It has comment @mentioning people involved in objection(s) and 
clarifying them 
3. Once we manage to find resolution we will send them in bundles to WG 
so that everyone who +1 original story can possibly object to modified 
verion. 
 
Larry offered during the call to send another email as Use Case TF chair 
and clearly invite everyone to pick a story(ies) to work with. I suggest 
linking from there to it to this email or to notes with same text in a 
tracker. 
https://www.w3.org/Social/InterestGroup/track/actions/6 
 
Cheers!