- From: Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:26:25 +0000
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>, Social Interest Group <public-social-interest@w3.org>
- CC: "Martin, Julie" <julie.martin@boeing.com>, "Donovan, Andrew R" <andrew.r.donovan@boeing.com>
What I want to understand, is how you guys anticipate using vocabularies in this project. And what we need to do to lay that foundation.
Thanks -- Ann
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Halpin [mailto:hhalpin@w3.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 1:13 PM
To: Bassetti, Ann; Social Web Working Group; Social Interest Group
Cc: Martin, Julie; Donovan, Andrew R
Subject: Re: Vocabulary 'tutorial'?
On 03/21/2015 11:51 PM, Bassetti, Ann wrote:
> Hello WG and IG compatriots --
>
> (I am also cc'ing my Boeing colleagues,who are Vocabulary experts in
> our Technical Library. They met a couple weeks ago, with the IG
> Vocabulary Task Force.)
>
> We talk about this and that vocabulary for the Social Web effort. I believe the Interest Group has a deliverable about vocabularies. But I, myself, am not totally clear on how this stuff works vis-à-vis vocabularies. Would someone be willing to give me (and anyone else who's interested) a small tutorial?
>
In terms of creating new vocabularies, an online tutorial would be good as well. However, like many Semantic Web efforts, the tooling is still in a pretty primitive state, despite dozens if not hundreds of academic papers on the topic. If one has money, Topbraid Composer is a great product and the one I used successfully to model vCard a while back.
I've sent an email to the semantic web list to get an update to see if there's any usable vocabulary tools aimed at non-experts.
cheers,
harry
> I'd really appreciate it, and would feel better equipped to understand what the IG needs to deliver on this point.
>
> Thanks -- Ann
>
> Ann Bassetti
>
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2015 21:27:01 UTC