Re: Social Web WG agenda for 11 August 2015

On 12 August 2015 at 16:42, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote:

> Ben clarified this during the call, and I dug up a permalink for the
> previous resolution. We had agreed to approve all the stories that had
> *only* +1 votes, since by having no 0's or -1, nobody was even doubting
> them.
>
> http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2015-08-11#t1439315941741
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-05-12-minutes#approve-all-plus-one-user-stories
>

Thanks for finding the links.  Agree with sandro's point on this one.


>
>
>
> ----
> Aaron Parecki
> aaronparecki.com
> @aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11 August 2015 at 09:58, Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Social Folks --
>>>
>>> I just entered my regrets into the wiki, for tomorrow's WG meeting.  I'm
>>> hoping this will be the last week I'm out. (Been working really hard  on my
>>> 94-year-old Mom's house, and with home health care providers, seeking as
>>> many assistive options as we can think of, so she can continue to live
>>> independently.)
>>>
>>> One idea we had in the Social IG meeting a couple weeks ago, was to use
>>> the Social WG  'off' week meeting times, to meet with WG folks (whoever we
>>> can get to show up) -- to try and talk through the objections on various
>>> user stories. Many of the ones with 'minor' objections seem based in nuance
>>> of language, about how the story was written -- more than objection to the
>>> fundamental concept of the story.
>>>
>>> Although we've had some really interesting discussions within the IG,
>>> and with a couple WG 'objectors' attending, it seems clear we need more WG
>>> involvement in these discussions.
>>>
>>> If the WG A) still thinks it would be useful to work through the user
>>> story objections; and, B) thinks it would be OK to use the alternating
>>> 'off' weeks for such discussion -- I will set it up for next Tuesday.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Ann
>>
>> The question of approved user stories was raised in yesterday's meeting.
>> Evan said that he seemed to recall that all the +1 user stories and the
>> +1/0 user stories might be considered approved.  We weren't 100% sure on
>> the call, I think a couple of people said they would check back on this.
>> Seems a reasonable approach.  Also note a few of the user stories now have
>> existing implementations.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm looking forward to getting back to this!
>>>
>>>  -- AnnB
>>>
>>> Ann Bassetti
>>> The Boeing Company
>>>
>>> *From: *Arnaud Le Hors
>>> *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 11:58 AM
>>> *To: *public-socialweb@w3.org
>>> *Subject: *Social Web WG agenda for 11 August 2015
>>>
>>> Now available:
>>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-08-11
>>> --
>>> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies -
>>> IBM Software Group
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>